Catcher In The Rye Vs. Rule Of The Bone

The two books, Catcher in the Rye and, Rule of the bone, do have some parallels.

Mostly, the main theme of the stories , a young, confused, boy trying to find himself and attempting to figure bulge out what they want out of life and what life wants out of them. That is pretty much(prenominal) where the similarities terminate for me.

        First look at the people themselves. Holden Caufield was a financially well off kid, from a private rail, he was intelligent, purge out though he always seemed to be looking for individual to hang out with, he was a independent person. As far as the novel led on he had a decent upbringing aside from the death of his brother. He just had deep- rooted mental problems that required therapy to help him through.

         in a flash Chappie, a.k.a. Bone, was a lower class kid, a public civilise drop- out, a drug dealing burn out, not really intelligent, when he put out the loner persona he deep down always needed to be around people. Now he had an awful upbringing. He was molested, which is a generous to mess anyone up right there, but on extremum of that he always felt like he was contend for his mothers love and loosing. His problems more came from his wanting rebel for no reason.



Anything permit wanted him to do he didnt, and that belike came from his distrust of the impending authority figures to him, his mother and step-father.

        As for the mis- adventures of the two boys, not much was the same. Holden spends a brief period of time at his school before he is removed. Then he takes a nice train ride to New York City where he even chats with someone he kind of knows. then he spends a few depressed days in the city where probably the worst thing that happens to him is...

If you want to get a proficient essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .