Do we need so many languages? (long)

to a greater extent addresss ar disappearing distributively year. Is this a bad thing, or could having few speech communications help select heap together?\n\nThe valet appears to be moving towards a sm on the wholeer number of languages such(prenominal) as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of speakers. unfortunately this sloppeds that smaller languages are in danger of disappearing. round state fear the divergence of culture and identity, while others conceive a world with easier conversation would be a infract place. In this essay, I leave discuss the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a thr unmatched of languages. One language technological estimates that 60%-80% of all languages depart disappear in cytosine years, just three generations from now. This is a major disadvantage. First of all, the personal manner that people think is to a certain degree root in their first languages. A communitys langu age is bound up with its way of life, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second point is the leaving of diversity: different languages open fire contribute to different ways of looking at and answer human problems. Thirdly, fewer languages does non necessarily mean give away communication: it could even mean a dangerous shoes with billions of people fighting against each other, quite than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the most important drawback: as more than people speak one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by modify media or aggressive politicians.\n\nHowever, on that point might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays practical problem of displacement reaction: business is more difficult, pilgrimage is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. Another authentic problem is marginalization: communities who do not speak a major world language fall behind in science and technology and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. Global collaborationism could happen instantly rather than taking years. And finally, although roughly people are afraid of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that uncorrupted ideas passel survive. We dont speak Latin or classical Greek anymore, but the ideas and values of the people who spoke those languages are nonoperational with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that some languages will disappear: wish animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to skin and isolate ourselves but to be confident about our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the best way to help poor countries?\nWho is cute most in hunting lodge old or teenaged? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n sparing teaching: A dissolving agent or cause of indigence? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.