Effective way of dealing with crime

Chapter 3 examines various criminological theories, which Wilson believes are important, but not as important as seeing what works and what doesn't. What works, he says, are punishment, deterrence, and locking criminals up.

Chapter 4 looks at what can be done to improve the policing of abuse. Wilson believes in experimenting to find out what works in policing and in every category of wickedness- battle. Police are more important in "the maintenance of orderly neighborhoods" than in "crime control" (74). We stay too much from police, who are only one objet d'art of anti-crime efforts.

Chapter 5 further explores the role of police. Wilson says that the most important societal function the police can do is to prevent neighborhoods from becoming uninhabitable because of crime. They cannot prevent crime, but they can be used efficaciously in experimental ways to maintain order in the familiarity.

Chapter 6 explores the importance of community relations for police. Police willing have a greater effect in fighting crime if they have good relations with the people in the community. The better the attitudes of police toward the citizens and of citizens toward the police, the better the ability of the police to do their work with the help of that community. The problem is that "There is a fundamental, and . . . inescapable conflict between strategies designed to cut street crime (saturation patrols, close surveillance) and those designed to minimize tens

Chapter 9 argues that, for the most part, criminals do not become rehabilitated in prison. Rehabilitation has not worked. Treating criminals with loose supervision does not veer their criminal behavior.

Chapter 2 examines the blimpish version of the causes and best greet to crime. Currie sees little worthwhile in the conservative flak. He says that conservative arguments about(predicate) crime and its causes and reduction are either incorrect, unfounded, or unhelpful. The basic conservative tenet is to increase punishment to center crime, but the 1980s showed that a "get tough" orgasm does not work very well.

Currie disagrees with the conservative view that crime is the result of American moral decline, of the failure of family and church and institutions to contribute proper values in children who then grow up to be criminals. Punishment as a social approach to crime does not work, Currie says.

Currie's give is well-written, clearly presented, and bolstered by citations at every point. He shows the weaknesses of both conservative and liberal positions. He argues effectively that crime-fighting needs to reorganize its priorities, needs to bring the community into the effort, and needs to focus on changing the socioeconomics of the country in order to prevent crime-creating conditions. If there is a weakness in the book it is that Currie makes his points at too great a length. The reader is convinced of the correctness of his point on an issue, and then he goes on and on to drive the point home again and again.

Wilson presents strong and convincing arguments for his positions. Crime has worsened since his revised book in 1983, so his points have even greater strike today. Society---with the emphasis on "three strikes, you're out" laws---has come around to Wilson's conservative position, with less emphasis on liberal social approaches to reducing crime. When he writes about heroin instead of about cocaine, and when he ignores gangs, we are reminded that t
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.