Athena is the one god who has faith in him and who serves as his protector and champion. Odysseus in The Odyssey is very more a real character. He is both kind and big than life. He is a hero, but he also has human flaws that make him interesting and that can also be seen as the source of many of his troubles. He has a good bay window of pride, and he is also filled with curiosity about the diverse people he and his men meet and other conflicting things they encounter on their way home. He insists on exploring the island of the Cyclops even though he is warned not to do so, a result of a combination of pride and curiosity that leads to his wanderings for the nex
Lattimore, Richard (tr.). The Odyssey of Homer. New York: Harper Collins, 1967.
The physical size of the people of Lilliput becomes a metaphor for their moral level as well -- they are truly undersize people, small-minded, small morally, small politically. They are revealed to be petty over time as they wrangle over such minor mercantile establishments as the en question. The first debate that takes up their time is over what to do with Gulliver, whom they call the Man-Mountain, and here they show their petty concerns and a genuine lack of humanity. They do not treat him as a human being but as an fauna, an intrusive animal that they would kill if they were not afraid that the rotting carcass would be a greater problem than the live creature.
Machiavelli wanted to raise the basis for the foundation of a new science of statesmanship. He looked to history in terms of the facts rather than theological or moral interpretations or implications. He was accused of teaching malign precisely because he examined the innovation of man apart from the world of God, and also because he accepted immoral sort from the Prince if that behavior promoted the interests of the state, while he rejected moral behavior on the part of the Prince if that behavior did not further the interests of the state.
Machiavelli placed his tension on the strong king, or prince, as the individual aerated with control of government and almost required to take whatever means he deemed necessary to accomplish his goals. As a humanist educator, Machiavelli details the nature, goals, and responsibilities of the Prince, the sovereign whose leadership determines the success or failure of the body politic and of the state over which he rules. In examining this issue, Machiavelli swept away much of the moralistic and theological baggage that had been attached to the issue in earlier periods and by earlier theorists, and he took a basically amoral approach to the issue and examined what the record showed regardin
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment