Erik Erikson Essay

Adulthood is a stage where people tend to nurture relationship more than ever . It also tends people to re evaluate various propositions of different levels of relationship and how one has been affected by itAccording to Erikson , the primary task of early adulthood is to ease up individualism and intimacy (sharing one s else (Zgourides , 2000 . Social influences are largely friends , and from here , drawing out and finding someone to sell the same values , likes or principles in life . being well-educated with someone helps the person to share his identity with his accessory . And this sense of intimacy brings them closer and opens one self to express their emotions to their partner or mate . But , if someone tends to withdraw himself from being intimate and fearing of getting committed , isolation starts to build . He or she tends to avoid getting on a more cryptic personal relationship there are a tie of reasons why these happens such as fear of commitment or responsibilityAnother important factor of adulthood is the generativity vs stagnation . Generativity primarily refers to having unblemished something essential to one s life and being able to nominate life a new meaning to someone . here(predicate) , the sense of being complete and importance of one self to the society usually occurs at this stage . Society plays a significant role to the one-on-one , as it influences them to become blue-chip to the community . On the other hand , the sense of non function or being non worthy comprises the stagnation part , where an individual does not give something for the welfare of others or to the communityWith reference to sexuality , according to (Markstrom Kalmanir , 2001 ) a criticism charged against Erikson s theory is that it is come to on men s psychosocial development in the absence of passing(prenominal) explanations for women s development . Variations of these views are present in an assertion that identity formation is a salient task for women , but it is scoop out understood in a context of connection and relatedness to others (e .g , Gilligan , 1982 Josselson , 1988 .

notwithstanding when sex roles and gender were examined , the predicted identity-intimacy connection held for all men , disregardless of sex role orientation , and for masculine-oriented but not feminine-oriented women . Because gender and sex roles have been shown to be meaningful variables in studies on identity and intimacy , these constructs were examined in the prediction of fidelity and rage . Analyses were conducted separately by gender to assess potentially differing patterns in the emergence of fidelity and loveReferencesGilligan , C (1982 . In a different voice : Psychological theory and women s development . Cambridge , MA : Harvard University PressMarkstrom , chant A Kalmanir , Heather M (2001 ) HYPERLINK http /web .ebscohost .com /ehost /viewarticle ? entropy dGJyMPPp44rp2 2fdV0 2bn jisfk5Ie42e2K4d7wiOqk63nn5Kx95uXxjL6qrUm1pbBIrq2eTrimr1Kvpp5Zy5zyit 2fk8 Xnh6ueH7N 2fiVa 2bttVGxrLZLsKekhN 2fk5VXj5KR84LPfiOac8nnls79mpNfsVbKutku vqbA 2b5OXwhd 2fqu37z4ups4 2b7y hid 106 o Linkages Between the Psychosocial Stages of Identity and Intimacy and the Ego Strengths of faithfulness and Love Linkages Between the Psychosocial Stages of Identity and Intimacy and the Ego Strengths of fidelity and Love Identity , Apr2001 , Vol . 1 Issue 2 , p179-196 , 18pZgourides , G (2000 ) Developmental Psychology Cliffs Quick Review Publication : nurse City , CA Cliffs Notes , 2000 ...If you want to get a profuse essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .