History of America by Howard Zinn

e., economic = military = powers) normally are the victorious champions, most of the time the ones cloaking their hidden agendas deep down rhetoric based on patriotism, democracy and human rights-something our catamenia g overnment has worked into a near art form where its contrary policy is concerned. A nonher major theme that emerges is that when the issue or historical incident is over, the version of the losers is usually forgotten over time and what becomes more fixed in our minds is the version that the winners take on felt it necessary to devote economics, time or media insurance coverage to, as with Henry Kissinger's first adjudge on europium which neglects the downside of the actions of atomic number 63an statesmen.

Even the Bible is revisionist memorial. All written work that portend to be an unbiased, objective chronicling of the past, including the American one, were written by individuals with different aims, purposes and most importantly, ideologies. Usually, it is the powerful, wealthy elite of society who economically pillar attempts to write history. In the beginning it was because they were the only ones with bills to support such adventures, and some among them, the few who could read. Today, history is appease prone to ideology and the influence of the wealthy, elite ruling discussion section of society. When it comes to platters on American history in particular, the facts are no different, even though in the past thirty or forty years we have seen the evolution of history that is more from a woman'

In the book by Jack Estrin, he delivers on his promise to patch up American history simple-too simple. In his brief account on Columbus, one would think the man a true shrine and one of the greatest navigators of all time. His final lines on the tyrannical, individualistic imperialist are "Fourteen years the great navigator was dead, unaware that he and his men had discovered a previously unknown continent. His voyage opened the door for the countries of Western Europe to exploit this vast New World," (Estrin 9).

There is non one word about the tyrannical abuses Columbus and his men inflicted onto the indigenous peoples they discovered, though to his credit Estrin does come clean with the fact that future(a) inhumanity from Europeans inflicted upon domestic Americans was largely the result of prejudice and greed, "The Native Americas seemed vastly inferior beings, even savages?these prejudices tended to be racial in origin?because the Indians worshipped many gods instead of the Christian God, the Europeans regarded them as heathens whom they had to convert?lack of interest in acquiring worldly-minded goods provided yet another reason to hold them in contempt," (Estrin 10).

Zinn, H. The 20th Century. HarperPerennial, NY: 1998.

The winners write history, not the losers, so says Howard Zinn in his "people's" history which does not delineate former events from the traditional perspective of the winners, but alternatively seeks to give us an understanding of the "losers"-not necessarily those who did not rouse bravely or courageously, not necessarily those whose ideology or goals were less or more valid than their victors, but, by necessity, those who did not write the accounting of events from the victorious perspective. It is the non-traditional rendering of this perspective that makes Zinn's book quite distinct from most high enlighten history texts. For example, the account of Christopher Columbus in most high school texts does not depict the inhumane tortures he brought
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.