HOBBES ON GOVERNMENT

There is unity excoriate in this segment of Locke's treatise that deserves attention by modern military gentleman's gentleman leaders ( aboutthing all too often ignored or overlooked): "aall men may be restrained from invading others rights and from doing tolerate to one another, and the law of nature be observed which willeth the deliverance of all mankind" (Locke 9).

Hpbbes, on the other hand, playms top hint that man has every right to defend himself as a means of self-preservation. There is no talk here of reciprocity. "aevery man has a right to everything except another man's body" (Hobbes 86). Hobbes sees this as a form of "preservation of his own nature" (86). If one reads the difference here between the deuce men it mogul be that Hobbes sees man's life and security as "his own stronghold" worth defending at any cost, enchantment Locke is more than kindly disposed toward the nature of man by claiming that he gets back as good as he gives. In modern idiom we might consider this a var. of "what goes around comes around" form of philosophy.

Hobbes invokes the Golden Rule in his understanding of liberty: that the liberty one man desires for himself should likewise serve as the sort of liberty slightlyone else advise claim for himself and no one has a right, by definition of the laws of nature, for anyone to take away that personal liberty, UNLESS (s

WORKS CITED:

While both men obviously see the laws of nature as stemming not from the people themselves plainly from some higher power, Locke has much more faith in the individual, with some reservations, than does Locke who favors a strong sovereign-led form of government. Part of the difference in the visions of these two men can be seen in the clock in which they lived. Hobbes, of course, lived from the reign of an aging Elizabeth I, through two Tudors and Cromwell.

He saw the obvious ruin to both his homeland as well as to its political strengths by the ineptness of the two kings and their usurpation by Cromwell. To Hobbes, royalty was a far more acceptable status quo than roundheads. Locke was more of a changeary, especially in his service to Shaftsbury who opposed much of Charles II's efforts and was jailed during the Whig Revolution while Locke himself fled to Holland. There is one phrase in this second Treatise which sure as shooting resounds centuries later: his mention of "the dignity of man" (13). Surely this show in the American Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as well as in France's Rights of Man. Hobbes, surely, would have sided with the Bourbons.

It is this basis for considering revolution to be in the interests of the majority of people that obviously adjust the tone for the Americans a century later. It was not the tax on tea, or conscription, or a tax on newspaper and pamphlets, or the occupation by foreign troops individually, but the accumulation of these activities which turned the American colonists into revolutionaries.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.